Posts Tagged ‘ppc’
September 15th, 2009 by Patrick Hare
The Google Adwords Quality Score is a bit of an enigma to most people who run their own Pay-Per-Click (PPC) marketing campaigns. This is because there are multiple factors involved, several of which are confidential to Google. The importance of the quality score, however, cannot be understated because it determines your position on sponsored results pages, and a page with a higher quality score can get a top ad position at a lower cost per click than the ad below it. High volume advertisers who pay better attention to quality score could potentially save hundreds of thousands of dollars per year on the same amount of traffic. Smaller businesses could still save tens of thousands of dollars, and get better online exposure or more clicks in general.
In order to understand the Adwords Quality Score, it is necessary to understand some of the history of Google Adwords, and Pay-Per-Click in general. PPC ads originally had been based on an “auction” method, where the highest bid on a keyword got the top spot. Search engines really didn’t care where the keyword landed, or even if the keyword was relevant to landing page content. Early on, Google Adwords adopted a different method for showing ads, where a higher click through rate (CTR) would result in better ad placement. In a manner of speaking, Google would rather make a nickel ten times than a quarter once. This still didn’t stop people from sending cheap traffic to barely relevant pages. Google prides itself on relevance, so it instituted a quality score which uses various algorithms to ensure that the keyword is relevant to the web page. MSN Adcenter and Yahoo Search Marketing also have followed suit with similar page quality guidelines.
In the course of our everyday PPC management work at Web.com Search Agency, we have compiled a useful set of guideline for PPC quality management. Here are some hints on how to improve your quality score:
- Read Google’s Quality Score Guidelines. Google updates this list regularly, and you may find a new quality improvement factor that is affecting your keywords.
- Improve Your Landing Page and Content. If you have a batch of keywords landing on a particular page, make sure that most variations of the keyword are visible on the page. This does not mean that you should stuff every variation into the content, but the highest volume words should be represented. Ideally, having the main keyword in the page title and an H1 tag would be a good idea as well.
- Build a history. Quality score is based on data related to your account, your ads, and your keywords. New accounts are going to experience a lag in exposure, which sometimes has to be overcome by high bidding. It can take a few weeks for keywords and ads to settle in their proper positions.
- Make better ads. Click through rate improves ad position. You want to create ads that are relevant to the products or services on the landing pages. You may want to use dynamic match, which has been shown to increase clickthrough and conversion rates when used properly.
- Don’t delete or edit old ads, pause them! Any time an ad is edited, its quality score resets. If you’re creating new ads, it is best to let the old ones run while the new ones build a history, so you don’t experience a sharp drop in traffic. If you’re using the Adwords Editor to make wholesale changes, you can experience a huge disruption if you aren’t feathering in new ads. Note that your keyword destination URL can be different than your ad’s destination, and a similar effect may occur if these destinations all change at the same time.
- Create specialized landing pages. One of the advantages of PPC is that you can land people on highly specialized pages that regular users will never see. Every keyword could potentially have its own landing page, but most people group pages by a set of keywords. You have the potential to adjust your quality score upward and test out new page elements at the same time, and you can prevent “duplicate content” SEO issues by placing your ads in a folder not visible to normal search engine spiders.
- Get rid of poor performers. If you have keywords that aren’t relevant enough, you should take them out of your adgroup. Generally speaking, smaller adgroups with tight sets of focused keywords tend to perform better. This also allows you to customize your ads for better keyword topic matching.
- Throw your landing page into the Google Keyword Tool. There is a feature on this tool that lets Google spider a page, and you can see what types of keywords Google thinks are relevant to the page. This tool will also show you potential broad match terms that might land people on your page, so you can use negative matching to filter out bad matches.
A final potential dividend that comes with improving your Quality Score is a higher conversion rate. Through its scoring system, Google is ensuring that the content on your site matches the keywords on your landing page. If you make your landing page keywords more prominent, people are more likely to look around the site and follow the sales process to its conclusion. In a manner of speaking, your PPC ad makes a promise, and your on-page content keeps it. Therefore, the work you do to improve your quality score saves you money, improves the prominence of your website, and earns a higher profit when people arrive at your website. Investing in a better quality score simultaneously serves as a cost-cutting and profit-increasing initiative, and should be a major part of any company’s continuous improvement process.
Tags: adwords, ppc, quality score Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
July 30th, 2009 by Patrick Hare
The recent search deal between Microsoft and Yahoo! is going to have an impact on search engine rankings, but unfortunately that impact won’t be fully seen until Bing and Yahoo results get merged over the course of the next year. Yahoo is going to be displaying Bing results, which are powered by what was once known as MSN Live Search.
People who monitor their search engine results on a monthly basis can attest to the high level of volatility in search engine positions on the former MSN, so there will be some curiosity as to whether Yahoo results will be as volatile. Bing also will have access to Yahoo’s search technology, so integration of best practices will hopefully have a positive impact on the churn seen by the average customer.
Both Yahoo and MSN have sponsored result platforms. Yahoo’s platform has been known as GoTo, then Overture, and is now called Yahoo Search Marketing. MSN/Bing’s platform is known as Adcenter. The latest terms of the deal indicate that Bing (Adcenter) will be the preferred platform for ad serving. People who have been in Pay-Per-Click for a few years know that Yahoo served up ads on MSN Search until early 2006. There is probably even an advantage for Bing, since cash-strapped marketers have been cutting back on lesser known ad serving platforms while trying to get maximum exposure on Google. Now, there will once again be a single ad serving platform. This favors Bing since there are even some cases where people didn’t bother to sign on to Adcenter, but now people will need to transition to the platform for Yahoo placement.
How does this impact paid inclusion? Yahoo has a program called Search Submit, which allows people to buy their way into the natural search results. It was previously sold through Inktomi and AltaVista, which Yahoo acquired and rebranded as Search Submit Express and Search Submit Pro. For some search engine purists, paid inclusion leads to less trust in Yahoo results since they are effectively populated with sponsored results. On the other side of the coin, there are sites that count on Search Submit Pro for a substantial revenue stream. At the time of this writing, there is no comment on paid inclusion, but its addition into Bing might give Google leverage from a trust perspective. Google does not allow paid inclusions in its natural results, so it could argue that it has “clean” results that aren’t bought and paid for.
Since Bing is going to be the default for search results, customers who want to be seen on Yahoo and Bing should consider adding fresh content on a regular basis, periodically getting more links to their website, and ensuring that the site is not presenting any obstacles to search engine spiders. Incidentally, this is the exact advice we would give to people who want better Google rankings, but our experience does show that Bing shows fresh pages faster, and is not necessarily as dependent on link popularity. Bing also appears to give preference to domain names that match keyword searches (just like Google) and is often the first search engine to rank new websites.
Until all the details are worked out, and various government agencies bless the whole transaction, SEO customers should concentrate on ranking factors that are universal to all search engines. In almost every case, optimization is based around the Google algorithm, since Google still controls the greatest market share. Over the past several years, there has been little demand for “better Yahoo results” from SEO clients, since a site’s success or failure in search results is generally determined by Google. Similarly, people weren’t clamoring for MSN placement, but the marketing push for Bing has led to a lot more inquiries about being visible in that engine. As always, the keys to good SEO results involve having a resource rich site, trustworthy links, and a structure that search engines can read. No matter how Bing and Yahoo blend their results, these factors are still going to be important, so anyone with a well optimized site is going to have a big advantage when the dust finally settles.
Tags: ppc, search engine optimization, yahoo msn deal Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
July 21st, 2009 by Patrick Hare
If you haven’t been to Yahoo.com lately, you may have learned from CNN that Yahoo! has a new homepage design. It can be personalized by the user, but the default design has an interesting aspect of its own.
A quick peek at the page indicates that it is calling more attention to its search feature, which resolves to a results page with the usual 10 natural results. Yahoo! then wraps the natural search results with around 14 paid ads (4 on top, 8 on the right, and 2 on the bottom) which is generally in excess of the delivery given by Google, but it does give advertisers a greater chance of being seen on the first page, which is very important. For example, you can usually find our site (submitawebsite.com, now known as Web.com Search Agency) around the #9 natural result in both Yahoo and Google for “search engine optimization.” This is a very competitive term and one of our claims to fame, since every SEO firm in the world wants to show its ability to be found somewhere in the top 30 search engine results, and will pay lots of money if they aren’t on the first page of natural results. (Your results may vary, since search engines show slightly different results depending on location and previous search history.)
How does the new Yahoo! homepage help the average website owner who is buying paid ads? In general, we see a better conversion rate for the traffic that comes from Yahoo Search Marketing, so an increase in search volume may lead to more conversions, lowering the overall cost per acquisition across the board. One of the stumbling blocks for cash-strapped online sellers has been volume, so people will occasionally forego Yahoo! and MSN/Bing in favor of as much Google traffic as they can afford. Unfortunately, this may not be the most cost effective approach for people who make a bigger profit on smaller search engines. If Yahoo! succeeds in demonstrating this to people, they may be able to lure more dollars back to their engine.
The advantage of this new format is that it should encourage people to search before they get distracted by content and other page elements. Given the downturn in paid search spending, this should help Yahoo! make the most of the bad economy. For Web.com Search Agency clients, the reduced competition means there is a lower overall cost of paid search advertising, since there are fewer bidders. Additionally, we have been able to help “big spenders” reduce their cost per acquisition, and in some cases they can get more of the “good clicks” that drive revenue.
Tags: ppc, yahoo Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
|
|